A free service by Scientific Network Management s-n-m.eu ↗
Funding Radar

Novel combinations of knowledge and research methods to address social issues and advance a fair green transition of neighbourhoods

EU Funding & Tenders Portal HORIZON-NEB-2027-01-PARTICIPATION-03 · Horizon Europe (HORIZON)

FunderEuropean Commission
Statusforthcoming
Opens05 May 2027
Deadline01 Dec 2027 — 396 days
ActionHORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
Official pagehttps://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunit…
Last checked2026-10-31 06:01:29+00:00

The scope text was read and no clause in it rules a field out. That is not a guarantee — read the call before you commit to it.

You are reading one call. 1,050 are open right now.

A search matches words. It cannot know what your institution works on. Give the name and every open call is ranked against it — this one included.

The ranking arrives by email: that is what the address is for. Deleted within 30 days, not an account, not a list. What we keep, and why.

Scored against your profile, highest first, exclusions quoted.
This call page is free · no account · the report arrives by email

What this call is

Instrument HORIZON-RIA
Stages single-stage
EU contribution €3.5m per project
Projects expected 4, sharing €14.0m

From the Commission's own budget table for this call. Confirm against the topic page before you plan around it: these move when a work programme is amended.

Scope

Expected Outcome: Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes: The scientific community, public authorities and neighbourhood [1] actors have a better understanding of social issues that influence the green transition [1] in neighbourhoods thanks to novel, transdisciplinary [1] combinations of knowledge and research methods. Robust evidence resulting from novel, transdisciplinary combinations of knowledge and research methods informs decision-making, policymaking, design and planning, and/or public service design for the green transition of neighbourhoods, including their nature-positive [4] transformation. Skills transfer among the scientific community and non-scientific actors involved in planning and implementing the green transition at the neighbourhood level. Scope: Social challenges (e.g. access to affordable housing, energy poverty, access to quality green spaces) impact the quality of life, health and well-being of individuals and communities [1] in neighbourhoods and influence how inhabitants experience and engage with the green transition. Advancing the green transition requires approaches that consider these varied experiences and ensure fairness and inclusion of all. However, the know-how of local communities and other non-scientific actors remains underexplored when it comes to generating and/or validating solutions to advance the green transition. This topic focuses on innovative approaches for combining knowledge from local communities and non-scientific actors with scientific knowledge and/or formal research methods to address social issues that influence the green transition in neighbourhoods. Proposals are expected to address all of the following: Develop an innovative, transdisciplinary approach that brings novel insights on social issues that hinder a fair green transition in neighbourhoods, including their nature-positive transformation. The approach is expected to: Define the social issue(s) to be investigated. Where relevant, identify links between the social issue(s), relevant social phenomena and local specificities. Integrate knowledge from local communities and non-scientific actors with scientific knowledge and/or formal research methods that are not usually combined. Be tested or validated in at least three neighbourhoods (in urban, peri-urban and rural areas) located in different Member States and/or Associated Countries. Propose guidelines and recommendations for the uptake of the resulting insights and transdisciplinary approaches in decision-making, policymaking, design and plannin…

What consortia for this call have looked like

2 projects have been funded under this line (HORIZON-NEB-PARTICIPATION-03) in Horizon Europe and H2020. This is what they were made of — not a recommendation, just what the Commission signed.

21partners, typically
range 18–21
10countries per consortium
16 seen across all of them
39organisations in total
across those projects

The mix of organisations

11 other organisations
10 companies
8 public bodies
7 research organisations
3 universities

Who coordinated them

Coordinating an EU project is a demanding, specific job. These organisations have done it on this topic line before.

Ethniko Kentro Erevnas Kai Technologikis Anapt · EL Ait Austrian Institute Of Technology Gmbh · AT

This is the shape, not the consortium. It says how many partners these projects had and what kinds of organisation were in them. It does not know whether your idea needs the same mix, who is available, who is already committed elsewhere, or how the work and the budget should be divided. Those are judgement calls on a specific proposal, and no amount of public data answers them.

Building the actual consortium — finding the partners, agreeing the roles, and writing it so it survives an evaluation — is what Scientific Network Management does. Free either way; the radar does not change if you never ask.

Get told when something changes

Most institutions find out about a call with three weeks left. We write when something opens, moves or closes that fits what you work on, with the deadline, the fit and the funder's own exclusion clauses quoted. Nothing in a quiet week. Free, and one click to leave.

Starting from the programme you are reading: Horizon Europe (HORIZON) — change it below if you like.

Leave the second box empty and you get whatever opened or changed recently, closing soonest. Fill it in and it ranks against your words instead: that is the difference between a list and a shortlist.

Scientific Network Management will send you the current list for these terms, and after that only what changes: a call that opens, a deadline that shifts, a clause that rules you out. Nothing is sent when nothing has moved. One click to stop, in every message.

One confirmation email and nothing else until you click it. No tracking pixels, no sharing, one click to unsubscribe.

Which of these are worth your time?

Of every 100 Horizon Europe proposals

70 score above the threshold 17 are funded
Clearing the bar is not what is scarce. Rank is, and rank starts with the call you enter.

A funding strategy reads your institution's own published record against the calls that are open, and says in writing which are worth the year and which to decline, with the reason for each.

See what it covers Talk to us

Scientific Network Management, the grant-writing practice behind this radar: 13 years of EU-funded research projects, and a founder who has served as Key Expert and Team Leader on two EU-funded technical assistance contracts establishing biotechnology centres in Türkiye.

SNM also does

Proposal writingHorizon Europe, EU4Health, EuropeAid. Concept to submission, or a review of a draft you already have.
Consortium buildingFinding and approaching the partners a call requires, and holding the consortium together through drafting.
Project managementRunning the project after the award: reporting, deliverables, coordination, audits.

No obligation, and nothing here is conditional on using us: searching the calls stays free and asks for nothing either way.