A free service by Scientific Network Management s-n-m.eu ↗
Funding Radar

Innovative microgrids for improved energy system integration and efficiency in urban contexts

EU Funding & Tenders Portal HORIZON-MISS-2027-04-CIT-01 · Horizon Europe (HORIZON)

FunderEuropean Commission
Statusforthcoming
Opens09 Feb 2027
Deadline07 Oct 2027 — 342 days
ActionHORIZON Innovation Actions
Official pagehttps://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunit…
Last checked2026-10-30 06:02:40+00:00

The scope text was read and no clause in it rules a field out. That is not a guarantee — read the call before you commit to it.

You are reading one call. 1,058 are open right now.

A search matches words. It cannot know what your institution works on. Give the name and every open call is ranked against it — this one included.

The ranking arrives by email: that is what the address is for. Deleted within 30 days, not an account, not a list. What we keep, and why.

Scored against your profile, highest first, exclusions quoted.
This call page is free · no account · the report arrives by email

What this call is

Instrument HORIZON-IA
Stages single-stage
EU contribution €7.0m per project
Projects expected 3, sharing €20.0m

From the Commission's own budget table for this call. Confirm against the topic page before you plan around it: these move when a work programme is amended.

Scope

Expected Outcome: Projects are expected to contribute to all the following outcomes: Improved awareness of the potential of Low Voltage Direct Current (LVDC) microgrids to support the goals of the European Green Deal and the Clean Industrial Deal, including as defined under the SET Plan [1] and the Solar Strategy [2] . Increased acceptance of LVDC microgrids in Europe, with significant and measurable contributions to human and building safety (notably with respect to DC faults), energy and resource efficiency, integration of renewables & storage and demand response, peak power shaving, resilience, and (where applicable) established proof of concept on how LVDC microgrids can enable energy communities [3] to share energy assets and increase self-consumption of local renewables sources. Increased uptake in European cities, facilitated by technical guidelines for installation of LVDC microgrids and recommendations on regulatory alignment to European, national, regional and local authorities, as well as power distribution operators. Increased number of regulatory options and standards supporting EU industry leadership in the supply of LVDC solutions, in line with the Competitiveness Compass guidelines for fostering innovation and growth. Scope: Most electric appliances in buildings are based on Direct Current (DC): PV panels, stationary and e-vehicle batteries, LED lighting, IT equipment, heat pumps and other appliances. Their connection to a LVDC microgrid inside the building would significantly improve energy and materials efficiency (replacing AC/DC converters by simpler DC/DC converters) and optimise local electrical and/or thermal energy storage and self-consumption of local renewables, contribute to (AC) grids stability through demand response and ancillary services (incl. reactive power support), and increase resilience by enabling islanded operation. The required power capacity of the connection of the LVDC microgrid to the AC (Alternating Current) distribution grid via a central AC/DC converter would be significantly lower than a traditional AC installation, thereby reducing pressure on city grid. The LVDC microgrid could also be implemented at small neighbourhood level (e.g. a street), possibly in parallel to an existing AC grid, enabling more efficient and easier sharing of common energy assets and self-consumption in an energy community. In order to reach this goal, proposals are expected to address all of the following aspects: Develop innovative, safe and sustainable LVDC microgrids design methods and tools, ensuring notably grid monitoring, co…

What consortia for this call have looked like

2 projects have been funded under this line (HORIZON-MISS-CIT-01) in Horizon Europe and H2020. This is what they were made of — not a recommendation, just what the Commission signed.

32partners, typically
range 30–32
12countries per consortium
16 seen across all of them
62organisations in total
across those projects

The mix of organisations

15 companies
13 universities
12 research organisations
12 public bodies
10 other organisations

Who coordinated them

Coordinating an EU project is a demanding, specific job. These organisations have done it on this topic line before.

Erevnitiko Panepistimiako Institouto Systimato · EL Ethniko Kentro Erevnas Kai Technologikis Anapt · EL

This is the shape, not the consortium. It says how many partners these projects had and what kinds of organisation were in them. It does not know whether your idea needs the same mix, who is available, who is already committed elsewhere, or how the work and the budget should be divided. Those are judgement calls on a specific proposal, and no amount of public data answers them.

Building the actual consortium — finding the partners, agreeing the roles, and writing it so it survives an evaluation — is what Scientific Network Management does. Free either way; the radar does not change if you never ask.

Get told when something changes

Most institutions find out about a call with three weeks left. We write when something opens, moves or closes that fits what you work on, with the deadline, the fit and the funder's own exclusion clauses quoted. Nothing in a quiet week. Free, and one click to leave.

Starting from the programme you are reading: Horizon Europe (HORIZON) — change it below if you like.

Leave the second box empty and you get whatever opened or changed recently, closing soonest. Fill it in and it ranks against your words instead: that is the difference between a list and a shortlist.

Scientific Network Management will send you the current list for these terms, and after that only what changes: a call that opens, a deadline that shifts, a clause that rules you out. Nothing is sent when nothing has moved. One click to stop, in every message.

One confirmation email and nothing else until you click it. No tracking pixels, no sharing, one click to unsubscribe.

Which of these are worth your time?

Of every 100 Horizon Europe proposals

70 score above the threshold 17 are funded
Clearing the bar is not what is scarce. Rank is, and rank starts with the call you enter.

A funding strategy reads your institution's own published record against the calls that are open, and says in writing which are worth the year and which to decline, with the reason for each.

See what it covers Talk to us

Scientific Network Management, the grant-writing practice behind this radar: 13 years of EU-funded research projects, and a founder who has served as Key Expert and Team Leader on two EU-funded technical assistance contracts establishing biotechnology centres in Türkiye.

SNM also does

Proposal writingHorizon Europe, EU4Health, EuropeAid. Concept to submission, or a review of a draft you already have.
Consortium buildingFinding and approaching the partners a call requires, and holding the consortium together through drafting.
Project managementRunning the project after the award: reporting, deliverables, coordination, audits.

No obligation, and nothing here is conditional on using us: searching the calls stays free and asks for nothing either way.