A free service by Scientific Network Management s-n-m.eu ↗
Funding Radar

Phase 1 including first-in-human clinical trials to test biomarker-guided medicines or multi-modal treatment interventions for patients with rare or very rare cancers or cancer subtypes

EU Funding & Tenders Portal HORIZON-MISS-2027-02-CANCER-03 · Horizon Europe (HORIZON)

FunderEuropean Commission
Statusforthcoming
Opens10 Feb 2027
Deadline16 Sep 2027 — 321 days
ActionHORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
Official pagehttps://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunit…
Last checked2026-10-30 06:02:40+00:00

The scope text was read and no clause in it rules a field out. That is not a guarantee — read the call before you commit to it.

You are reading one call. 1,058 are open right now.

A search matches words. It cannot know what your institution works on. Give the name and every open call is ranked against it — this one included.

The ranking arrives by email: that is what the address is for. Deleted within 30 days, not an account, not a list. What we keep, and why.

Scored against your profile, highest first, exclusions quoted.
This call page is free · no account · the report arrives by email

What this call is

Instrument HORIZON-RIA
Stages single-stage
EU contribution €7.0m to €9.0m per project
Projects expected 3, sharing €24.0m

From the Commission's own budget table for this call. Confirm against the topic page before you plan around it: these move when a work programme is amended.

Scope

Expected Outcome: Proposals under this topic should aim to deliver results that are directed and tailored towards, and contribute to all of the following expected outcomes: Patients with rare or very rare cancers or cancer subtypes have access to tailored, promising biomarker-guided medicines or multi-modal treatment interventions via participation in subsequent clinical trials or national or regional compassionate use programmes by health authorities; Researchers, physicians, innovators [1] , startup, spin-off and spin-out companies, SMEs, charities or foundations and other professionals from different disciplines and sectors have access to innovative technology, medical devices or promising biomarker-guided medicines for further validation or commercialisation; National healthcare providers, policymakers and authorities in European regions, EU Member States and Associated Countries have early safety and efficacy evidence to support further testing of affordable biomarker-guided medicines or multi-modal treatment interventions that benefit patients with rare or very rare cancers in their healthcare systems; Scope: Patients with rare and very rare [2] cancers across EU Member States and Associated Countries often present with advanced disease due to late diagnosis and have access to few treatment options. Hence, these patients typically have a lower 5-year overall survival than those with more common cancers and face challenges with timely access to a small number of appropriate phase 1 clinical trials, despite good disease control rates [3] , to validate biomarker-guided medicines or multi-modal treatment interventions targeting their disease and adapted to an increasingly precision oncology healthcare landscape. Proposals should address all the following: When still relevant and required, finalise the preclinical validation of promising [4] biomarker-guided drugs [5] , for rare or very rare cancer indications through in vivo and/or ex vivo and/or in silico research models. Drug repurposing should be considered [6] . Data should be disaggregated by tumour biology, sex, gender, age and other relevant variables, such as by measures of socio-economic status or ethnicity; Validate early safety and efficacy of innovative medicines or as part of multi-modal treatment interventions in phase 1, including in first-in-human, multi-centre clinical trials, considering new trial designs [7] , for and with patients with rare or very rare cancers and their caregivers/families; The primary and secondary endpoints of the clinical trial(s) should support safety, efficacy…

What consortia for this call have looked like

3 projects have been funded under this line (HORIZON-MISS-CANCER-03) in Horizon Europe and H2020. This is what they were made of — not a recommendation, just what the Commission signed.

21partners, typically
range 13–22
12countries per consortium
18 seen across all of them
56organisations in total
across those projects

The mix of organisations

22 universities
9 companies
9 research organisations
8 public bodies
8 other organisations

Who coordinated them

Coordinating an EU project is a demanding, specific job. These organisations have done it on this topic line before.

Universiteit Gent · BE Stichting Amsterdam Umc · NL Alma Mater Studiorum - Universita Di Bologna · IT

This is the shape, not the consortium. It says how many partners these projects had and what kinds of organisation were in them. It does not know whether your idea needs the same mix, who is available, who is already committed elsewhere, or how the work and the budget should be divided. Those are judgement calls on a specific proposal, and no amount of public data answers them.

Building the actual consortium — finding the partners, agreeing the roles, and writing it so it survives an evaluation — is what Scientific Network Management does. Free either way; the radar does not change if you never ask.

Get told when something changes

Most institutions find out about a call with three weeks left. We write when something opens, moves or closes that fits what you work on, with the deadline, the fit and the funder's own exclusion clauses quoted. Nothing in a quiet week. Free, and one click to leave.

Starting from the programme you are reading: Horizon Europe (HORIZON) — change it below if you like.

Leave the second box empty and you get whatever opened or changed recently, closing soonest. Fill it in and it ranks against your words instead: that is the difference between a list and a shortlist.

Scientific Network Management will send you the current list for these terms, and after that only what changes: a call that opens, a deadline that shifts, a clause that rules you out. Nothing is sent when nothing has moved. One click to stop, in every message.

One confirmation email and nothing else until you click it. No tracking pixels, no sharing, one click to unsubscribe.

Which of these are worth your time?

Of every 100 Horizon Europe proposals

70 score above the threshold 17 are funded
Clearing the bar is not what is scarce. Rank is, and rank starts with the call you enter.

A funding strategy reads your institution's own published record against the calls that are open, and says in writing which are worth the year and which to decline, with the reason for each.

See what it covers Talk to us

Scientific Network Management, the grant-writing practice behind this radar: 13 years of EU-funded research projects, and a founder who has served as Key Expert and Team Leader on two EU-funded technical assistance contracts establishing biotechnology centres in Türkiye.

SNM also does

Proposal writingHorizon Europe, EU4Health, EuropeAid. Concept to submission, or a review of a draft you already have.
Consortium buildingFinding and approaching the partners a call requires, and holding the consortium together through drafting.
Project managementRunning the project after the award: reporting, deliverables, coordination, audits.

No obligation, and nothing here is conditional on using us: searching the calls stays free and asks for nothing either way.