A free service by Scientific Network Management s-n-m.eu ↗
Funding Radar

AI-powered foodome characterization

EU Funding & Tenders Portal HORIZON-CL6-2027-02-FARM2FORK-08 · Horizon Europe (HORIZON)

FunderEuropean Commission
Statusforthcoming
Opens20 Apr 2027
Deadline23 Sep 2027 — 328 days
ActionHORIZON Innovation Actions
Official pagehttps://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunit…
Last checked2026-10-30 06:02:40+00:00

The scope text was read and no clause in it rules a field out. That is not a guarantee — read the call before you commit to it.

You are reading one call. 1,058 are open right now.

A search matches words. It cannot know what your institution works on. Give the name and every open call is ranked against it — this one included.

The ranking arrives by email: that is what the address is for. Deleted within 30 days, not an account, not a list. What we keep, and why.

Scored against your profile, highest first, exclusions quoted.
This call page is free · no account · the report arrives by email

What this call is

Instrument HORIZON-IA
Stages single-stage
EU contribution €7.8m per project
Projects expected 1, sharing €7.8m

From the Commission's own budget table for this call. Confirm against the topic page before you plan around it: these move when a work programme is amended.

Scope

Expected Outcome: Project results are expected to contribute to all the following expected outcomes: an Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool able to accelerate the analysis of complex foodomics data to speed up the identification, structural characterisation, and quantification of chemicals present in food; improving capacity and synergies in foodomics research between academia, research infrastructures and industry. Scope: Through food and beverages, the population is exposed to an immense variety of chemicals (as contaminants and as ingredients). The “foodome” is the complete set of compounds present in a food sample at a given time; it includes both endogenous biomolecules (produced through a species' metabolic processes) and exogenous compounds (natural and synthetic substances from production, processing, handling, and packaging). The current knowledge is largely confined to a narrow set of approximately 150 food components catalogued by traditional databases. These components represent only a very small fraction of the total chemical complexity present in foods, while thousands (>100,000) of compounds and contaminants remain largely unquantified and underexplored. Understanding this “nutrient dark matter” would require identifying, cataloguing and quantifying the full spectrum of substances present in our food and present in accessible, AI-ready databases. The need for such information is today a bottleneck to make the nutrition field predictive and data driven, and has the potential to make food processing more efficient in bringing new foods items on the market. Efforts to create such datasets are underway but owing to the quantity of samples (hundreds of thousands of compounds across thousands of foods), such databases often rely on high-throughput experimental methods which do not allow a precise characterisation of the molecules identified. Proposals should address the following activities: develop and test validated AI algorithms capable of interpreting and annotating high-throughput foodomics data, for instance from untargeted mass-spectrometry or nuclear magnetic resonance; the AI algorithms should be capable to predict or infer the presence and concentration of compounds based on (incomplete) foodomics data via innovative approaches, for instance by considering phylogenic relationships between species. Moreover, this should help identify analytical methods and potential food safety hazards based on their similarity to known compounds; develop a European research and innovation network between Member States and Associated Countries in food …

Get told when something changes

Most institutions find out about a call with three weeks left. We write when something opens, moves or closes that fits what you work on, with the deadline, the fit and the funder's own exclusion clauses quoted. Nothing in a quiet week. Free, and one click to leave.

Starting from the programme you are reading: Horizon Europe (HORIZON) — change it below if you like.

Leave the second box empty and you get whatever opened or changed recently, closing soonest. Fill it in and it ranks against your words instead: that is the difference between a list and a shortlist.

Scientific Network Management will send you the current list for these terms, and after that only what changes: a call that opens, a deadline that shifts, a clause that rules you out. Nothing is sent when nothing has moved. One click to stop, in every message.

One confirmation email and nothing else until you click it. No tracking pixels, no sharing, one click to unsubscribe.

Which of these are worth your time?

Of every 100 Horizon Europe proposals

70 score above the threshold 17 are funded
Clearing the bar is not what is scarce. Rank is, and rank starts with the call you enter.

A funding strategy reads your institution's own published record against the calls that are open, and says in writing which are worth the year and which to decline, with the reason for each.

See what it covers Talk to us

Scientific Network Management, the grant-writing practice behind this radar: 13 years of EU-funded research projects, and a founder who has served as Key Expert and Team Leader on two EU-funded technical assistance contracts establishing biotechnology centres in Türkiye.

SNM also does

Proposal writingHorizon Europe, EU4Health, EuropeAid. Concept to submission, or a review of a draft you already have.
Consortium buildingFinding and approaching the partners a call requires, and holding the consortium together through drafting.
Project managementRunning the project after the award: reporting, deliverables, coordination, audits.

No obligation, and nothing here is conditional on using us: searching the calls stays free and asks for nothing either way.